skip to content »

Does carbon dating support evolution

does carbon dating support evolution-25

Geologists insist that it is just as wrongheaded as old-school blind-faith creationism, but they do so with a touch of grudging respect.

does carbon dating support evolution-86does carbon dating support evolution-71does carbon dating support evolution-73

After retreating from serious public engagement following the debacle of the prosecution of Tennessee science teacher John Scopes in 1925, some religious thinkers posited that the data did indeed support the standard reading of the geologic and biological record. But that still didn’t explain where the Earth came from in the first place.Most attention has focused on votes to require the teaching of intelligent design in .Both initiatives have been challenged in court, but similar campaigns are under way in at least 15 other states.Doris Anderson, a retired registered nurse who pursued a second career as a journalist, translates her husband’s perorations for the everyday reader in brochures and booklets that explain, in no-nonsense but engaging prose, how he believes the geologic changes at and around Mount St.Helens — the “7 Wonders” — prove that processes that mainstream scientists insist took millions of years can actually occur in days, or even hours.Lloyd Anderson still gets revved up by the mountain.

He is 69 and hard of hearing, but when he gets rolling in the booming cadences of the nondenominational minister he was until 1999, the years fall away and the words tumble out with the message he has committed his retirement to bringing forth.

Anderson says he could marshal any number of scientific arguments to prove that the biblical global flood happened as it is described in Genesis, from inaccuracies in radiocarbon dating to gaps in the fossil record to superfine stratification of sedimentary layers around Mount St. Scientists say it just doesn’t work that way Creation theory has always driven mainstream scientists nuts.

But scientific young-Earth creationism is a special case.

Adherents of what is called intelligent design are careful not to speak of “creationism” as it is popularly understood, weary of the Bible-thumping stereotype the word calls up and aware that the Supreme Court has barred teaching the concept in the public schools.

So religious legislators and school board members around the country have latched onto intelligent design as a palatable vehicle for undermining evolution in the curriculum.

Helens, which rises behind Anderson and his joyous grin.