Aadult dating txt 223
In some states, this question has turned on whether the consent form signed by the patient was broad enough to cover the surgeon actually performing the surgery. Does the following clause in the consent form signed by patient cover this additional procedure? No, because the patient was not aware the surgeon was going to remove his left testicle.
The basis of all legal and ethical obligations between a physician and a patient. She has not seen this patient for more than a year. Physician is hired by Employer, and Physician sends his report to Employer. It is Employee's responsibility to ask about the test results. Physician should call Employee in for further tests, and if indicated, begin treatment immediately. Feedback: There is no liability for medical malpractice because there is no physician-patient relationship when the employer retains the physician for a work-related evaluation. What is the preferred course of action for the physician? See AMA Medical Code of Ethics, Sections 9.065 and 10.05. Employee, who works with asbestos, is evaluated by Physician each year for asbestos-related illnesses. It is Employer's duty to share the tests results with Employee. Physician should send Employee a copy of the test results with a clear explanation of the potential problem and encourage him to seek medical help. A patient, in no uncertain terms, withdraws consent for a procedure after it has begun. There must be no doubt that consent was actually withdrawn. In the order of preference (depending upon the physician's determination that the person chosen has exhibited certain qualifications: (1) spouse, (2) adult children, (3) parents, (4) adult siblings, (5) any adult relative, and (6) any other adult who has exhibited special care and concern for the patient, is familiar with the patient's personal values, and is available and willing to serve. Yes, because it was medically advisable to do the additional procedure. No, because the patient was not aware the surgeon was going to remove his left testicle. The patient's claim for medical malpractice was dismissed, and the case proceeded to the jury for a determination on the claim for medical battery. If a patient can show that she was not aware that the physician was going to perform the procedure or that she did not authorize it, which of the following legal claims does she have? Despite the signed consent form, this issue went to the jury to determine whether the patient was aware that his left testicle may be removed, and if so, did he authorize the procedure. Correct Answer: Physician-Patient Relationship Number 2. The physician-patient relationship is the basis of all legal and ethical obligations between a physician and a patient. Two words that describe the physician-patient relationship. Mutual and consensual describe the physician-patient relationship.
Mother asks Physician to treat her because she doesn't trust anyone else. EMTALA also may impose penalties on physicians who are responsible for covering the ER and who fail to treat patients in emergency situations.
Patient's religious beliefs require him to refuse blood transfusions or blood products. Physicians have an obligation to share in providing charity care, but not to the degree that would seriously compromise the care provided to existing patients. Ignore the patient because after the procedure has started, it is too late to withdraw consent. Determine whether it is medically feasible to discontinue the treatment. Continue treatment while trying to convince the patient to change his mind. The patient must act or use language which can be subject to no other inference and which must be unquestioned responses from a clear and rational mind.
Refusal on these grounds may also violate anti-discrimination laws. Feedback: When medical treatments or examinations occurring with the patient's consent are proceeding in a manner requiring bodily contact between the doctor and the patient, and consent to the contact is withdrawn, it must be medically feasible for the doctor to stop the treatment or examination at that point without being detrimental to the patient's health or life. Which of the following terms describes the type of consent given?
Patient has been Physician's patient for 10 years, but is considering changing physicians. What is Physician's preferred course of action in this situation? Thus, the physician may be subject to disciplinary action for unethical conduct. In Tennessee, as well as in many other states, a non-physician has no duty to obtain informed consent.
The report shows that Employee has a suspicious spot on his lung. Physician owes no duty to Employee because there is no physician-patient relationship. Physician should send Employee a copy of the test results with a clear explanation of the potential problem and encourage him to seek medical help. However, the American Medical Association maintains that the ethical course of action is to notify the patient of any adverse test results. The attending physician Feedback: The physician may delegate the task of getting informed consent, but the ultimate responsibility remains with the physician who performs the procedure or under whose direction a non-physician performs it.
She hasn't seen this patient for more than a year and the physician-patient relationship has been terminated. See generally, AMA Code of Medical Ethics, Section 8.14 Number 6. Feedback: Generally, physicians should not treat themselves or members of their immediate family. This term describes the situation where a physician informally asks for another physician's opinion about a patient's symptoms or test results, and the second physician does not examine the patient. Specialist was retained to give a second opinion about the appropriateness of performing the procedure, and the physician-patient relationship clearly existed between the two when Specialist examined Patient and rendered the opinion. Specialist examines Patient and agrees with Physician that the procedure would be appropriate for Patient. The fact that Patient did not contact Specialist after the initial examination is not conclusive that Patient dismissed him as her doctor. Patient comes to the ER with severe chest pain, and despite the efforts of the ER physicians, Patient dies of a heart attack. Patient did not consent to have Cardiologist as a physician. She was not present when the alleged negligence occurred. It is the hospital's responsibility to provide back-up for on-call physicians. She did not affirmatively participate in the diagnosis or treatment of the patient. She did not affirmatively participate in the diagnosis or treatment of the patient.